Abacus Tech for Good
Transparency in sustainability
Our ESG vision
The extra-financial investment objective of the Abacus Tech for Good fund is to promote environmental, social, societal and good governance characteristics, as defined in article 8 of the SFDR Regulation.
Within the investment universe, preference is given to shares of European companies whose activities and extra-financial approaches are linked to the promotion of ESG and sustainability characteristics.
DISTRIBUTION OF ESG SCORES
The Abacus Tech for Good adopts a comprehensive extra-financial strategy. In particular, the fund’s specific analysis constrains the investment universe in the same way as the financial analysis. Within the investment universe, preference is given to shares of European companies of all capitalisations whose activities are linked to the promotion of ESG and sustainability characteristics.
Within the meaning of the SFDR regulation, the fund refers to article 8. Thus, the fund implements several approaches:
- Normative exclusions: excluding companies involved in controversial weapons and companies found in violation of the 10 principles of the UN Global Compact and the OECD Guidelines;
- Sectoral exclusions: fossil fuels, coal-fired power, tobacco and the adult entertainment industry;
- “Best-in-Universe”;
- ESG risk and impact analysis;
- Greenhouse gas emissions analysis, scopes 1,2,3;
- Positive impact and sustainability analysis;
- Dialogue with companies to deepen our analysis and encourage positive impact;
- Risk and controversy monitoring.
Lack of a sustainable investment objective
“This financial product promotes environmental or social characteristics but does not aim at sustainable investment.”
Indicateurs applicables aux investissements dans des sociétés | ||||||||
Indicateur d’incidences négatives sur la durabilité | Élément de mesure | Incidences 2024 | Incidences 2023 | Explication | Couverture 2024 | Couverture 2023 | Mesures prises | |
INDICATEURS CLIMATIQUES ET AUTRES INDICATEURS RELATIFS À L’ENVIRONNEMENT | ||||||||
Émissions de gaz à effet de serre | 1. Émissions de GES | Émissions de GES de niveau 1 | 46.68 | 91.31 | En Tonnes eq CO2 | 0.9 | 0.96 | Nous avons mis en place une nouvelle méthodologie de calcul des émissions de CO2 pour nos fonds. Nous avons pris en compte le poids de l'entreprise dans le portefeuille, notre part dans le capital, et le taux de couverture de l'indicateur pour obtenir les données les plus fiables. |
Émissions de GES de niveau 2 | 86.58 | 171.41 | En Tonnes eq CO2 | 0.9 | 0.97 | |||
Émissions de GES de niveau 3 | 4966.91 | 2583.86 | En Tonnes eq CO2 | 0.74 | 0.91 | |||
Émissions totales de GES de niveau 1 et 2 | 133.25 | 262.73 | En Tonnes eq CO2 | 0.9 | 0.96 | |||
Émissions totales de GES de niveau 1, 2 et 3 | 5100.16 | 2846.59 | En Tonnes eq CO2 | 0.74 | 0.91 | |||
2. Empreinte carbone | Empreinte carbone Scope 1 et 2 | 20.61 | 43.11 | scope 1+2 / M€ investis | 0.9 | 0.96 | Suivi régulier | |
Empreinte carbone Scope 1,2,3 | 138.08 | 427.94 | scope 1+2+3 / M€ investis | 0.74 | 0.91 | Suivi régulier | ||
3. Intensité de GES des sociétés bénéficiaires des investissements | Intensité de GES des sociétés bénéficiaires des investissements Scope 1,2 | 46.92 | 92.85 | scope 1+2/ CA | 0.9 | 0.96 | Suivi régulier | |
Intensité de GES des sociétés bénéficiaires des investissements Scope 1,2,3 | 275.55 | 615.08 | scope 1+2+3/ CA | 0.74 | 0.91 | Suivi régulier | ||
4. Exposition à des sociétés actives dans le secteur des combustibles fossiles | Part d’investissement dans des sociétés actives dans le secteur des combustibles fossiles | Le secteur des combustibles fossiles est exclu de l'univers d'investissement. | Politique d'exclusion | |||||
Energy | 5. Part de consommation et de production d’énergie non renouvelable | Part de la consommation et de la production d’énergie des sociétés bénéficiaires d’investissement qui provient de sources d’énergie non renouvelables, par rapport à celle provenant de sources d’énergie renouvelables, exprimée en pourcentage du total des sources d’énergie | 0.58 | 0.55 | % | 0.64 | 0.53 | Suivi régulier |
6. Intensité de consommation d’énergie par secteur à fort impact climatique | Consommation d’énergie en GWh par million d’euros de chiffre d’affaires des sociétés bénéficiaires d’investissements, par secteur à fort impact climatique | |||||||
Secteur A | 0 | GWH/ M€ CA | Suivi régulier | |||||
Secteur C | 0.09 | 0.63 | GWH/ M€ CA | 0.78 | 0.66 | |||
Secteur E | 0 | GWH/ M€ CA | ||||||
Secteur F | 0 | 0 | GWH/ M€ CA | 0 | 0.16 | |||
Secteur G | 0 | 0 | GWH/ M€ CA | 1 | ||||
Secteur H | 0 | 0 | GWH/ M€ CA | |||||
Secteur L | 0 | 0 | GWH/ M€ CA | |||||
Biodiversité | 7. Activities negatively affecting biodiversity- sensitive areas | Share of investments in investee companies with sites/operations located in or near to biodiversity- sensitive areas where activities of those investee companies negatively affect those areas | ||||||
Eau | 8. Emissions to water | Tonnes of emissions to water generated by investee companies per million EUR invested, expressed as a weighted average | 11.84 | 0.208 | Les émissions d'eau sont inconnues. Les données recueillies font référence à la consommation d'eau en Km3/ M€. | 0.41 | 0.32 | Suivi régulier |
Déchets | 9. Hazardous waste ratio | Tonnes of hazardous waste generated by investee companies per million EUR invested, expressed as a weighted average | 9.5109805359 | 6.1401359687 | Tonnes / M€ | 0.47 | 0.26 | Suivi régulier |
INDICATEURS LIÉS AUX QUESTIONS SOCIALES, DE PERSONNEL, DE RESPECT DES DROITS DE L’HOMME ET DE LUTTE CONTRE LA CORRUPTION ET LES ACTES DE CORRUPTION | ||||||||
Les questions sociales et de personnel | 10. Violations des principes du pacte mondial des Nations unies et des principes directeurs de l’OCDE pour les entreprises multinationales | Part d’investissement dans des sociétés qui ont participé à des violations des principes du Pacte mondial des Nations unies ou des principes directeurs de l’OCDE à l’intention des entreprises multinationales | Les entreprises qui violent les principes du Pacte mondial Global Compact et des Principes directeurs de l'Organisation de coopération et de développement économiques (OCDE) à l'intention des entreprises multinationales sont exclues de l'univers d'investissement. | Politique d'exclusion | ||||
11. Absence de processus et de mécanismes de conformité permettant de contrôler le respect des principes du Pacte mondial des Nations unies et des principes directeurs de l’OCDE à l’intention des entreprises multinationales | Part d’investissement dans des sociétés qui n’ont pas de politique de contrôle du respect des principes du Pacte mondial des Nations unies ou des principes directeurs de l’OCDE à l’intention des entreprises multinationales, ni de mécanismes de traitement des plaintes ou des différents permettant de remédier à de telles violations | 0.51 | 0.63 | Concerne les entreprises qui ne sont pas signataires du Pacte mondial des Nations Unies | 0.89 | 0.84 | Suivi régulier | |
12. Écart de rémunération entre hommes et femmes non corrigé | Écart de rémunération moyen non corrigé entre les hommes et les femmes au sein des sociétés bénéficiaires des investissements | Aucune donnée crédible n'était disponible | ||||||
13. Mixité au sein des organes de gouvernance | Ratio femmes/hommes moyen dans les organes de gouvernance des sociétés concernées, en pourcentage du nombre total de membres | 0.35 | 0.31 | % | 0.94 | 0.99 | Suivi régulier | |
14. Exposition à des armes controversées (mines antipersonnel, armes à sous-munitions, armes chimiques ou armes biologiques) | Part d’investissement dans des sociétés qui participent à la fabrication ou à la vente d’armes controversées | Les entreprises dont les activités sont liées à des armes controversées sont exclues de l'univers d'investissement. | Politique d'exclusion | |||||
Indicateurs applicables aux investissements dans des émetteurs souverains ou supranationaux | ||||||||
Indicateur d’incidences négatives sur la durabilité | Élément de mesure | Incidences 2024 | Incidences 2023 | Explication | Couverture 2024 | Couverture 2023 | Mesures prises | |
Environnement | 15. Intensité de GES | Intensité de GES des pays d’investissement | Non applicable | Les fonds n'investissent pas dans des titres souverains et supranationaux. | ||||
Social | 16. Pays d’investissement connaissant des violations de normes sociales | Nombre de pays d’investissement connaissant des violations de normes sociales (en nombre absolu et en proportion du nombre total de pays bénéficiaires d’investissements), au sens des traités et conventions internationaux, des principes des Nations unies ou, le cas échéant, du droit national. | Non applicable | Les fonds n'investissent pas dans des titres souverains et supranationaux. | ||||
Indicateurs applicables aux investissements dans des actifs immobiliers | ||||||||
Indicateur d’incidences négatives sur la durabilité | Élément de mesure | Incidences 2024 | Incidences 2023 | Explication | Couverture 2024 | Couverture 2023 | Mesures prises | |
Combustibles fossiles | 17. Exposition à des combustibles fossiles via des actifs immobiliers | Part d’investissement dans des actifs immobiliers utilisés pour l’extraction, le stockage, le transport ou la production de combustibles fossiles | Non applicable | Les fonds n'investissent pas dans des titres souverains et supranationaux. | ||||
Efficacité énergétique | 18. Exposition à des actifs immobiliers inefficaces sur le plan énergétique | Part d’investissement dans des actifs immobiliers inefficaces sur le plan énergétique | Non applicable | Les fonds n'investissent pas dans des titres souverains et supranationaux. | ||||
Autres indicateurs relatifs aux principales incidences négatives sur les facteurs de durabilité | ||||||||
INDICATEURS CLIMATIQUES ET AUTRES INDICATEURS RELATIFS À L’ENVIRONNEMENT | ||||||||
Émissions | 4. Investissements dans des sociétés n’ayant pas pris d’initiatives pour réduire leurs émissions de carbone | Part d’investissement dans des sociétés qui n’ont pas pris d’initiatives pour réduire leurs émissions de carbone aux fins du respect de l’accord de Paris | 0.18 | 0.2 | % | 0.89 | 0.96 | Suivi régulier |
Eau, déchets et autres matières | 7. Investissements dans des sociétés sans politique de gestion de l’eau | Part d’investissement dans des sociétés sans politique de gestion de l’eau | 0.51 | 0.59 | % | 0.85 | 0.8 | Suivi régulier |
INDICATEURS LIÉS AUX QUESTIONS SOCIALES, DE PERSONNEL, DE RESPECT DES DROITS DE L’HOMME ET DE LUTTE CONTRE LA CORRUPTION ET LES ACTES DE CORRUPTION | ||||||||
Social and employee matters | 1. Investissements dans des entreprises sans politique de prévention des accidents du travail | Part d’investissement dans des sociétés sans politique de prévention des accidents du travail | 0.13 | 0.04 | % | 0.88 | 0.96 | Suivi régulier |
2. Taux d’accidents | Taux d’accidents dans les sociétés concernées, en moyenne pondérée | 2.73 | 0.83 | Se réfère au taux total d'incidents enregistrable | 0.54 | 0.5 | Suivi régulier | |
4. Absence de code de conduite pour les fournisseurs | Part d’investissement dans des sociétés sans code de conduite pour les fournisseurs (lutte contre les conditions de travail dangereuses, le travail précaire, le travail des enfants et le travail forcé) | 0.23 | 0.13 | Les données concernent les entreprises qui ne prennent pas en compte les critères ESG (pas seulement sociaux) dans la gestion de leur chaîne d'approvisionnement. | 0.85 | 0.97 | Suivi régulier | |
6. Protection insuffisante des lanceurs d’alerte | Part d’investissement dans des entités qui n’ont pas défini de politique de protection des lanceurs d’alerte | 0.14 | 0.22 | % | 0.89 | 0.87 | Suivi régulier | |
Droits de l’homme | 9. Absence de politique en matière de droits de l’homme | Part d’investissement dans des entités ne disposant pas d’une politique en matière de droits de l’homme | 0.23 | 0.12 | % | 0.88 | 0.95 | Suivi régulier |
Lutte contre la corruption et les actes de corruption | 15. Absence de politique de lutte contre la corruption et les actes de corruption | Part d’investissement dans des entités ne disposant pas d’une politique de lutte contre la corruption et les actes de corruption conforme à la convention des Nations unies contre la corruption | 0.07 | 0.05 | % | 0.85 | 0.9 | Suivi régulier |
The Fund ensures that it is aligned with the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, including the principles and rights set out in the eight core conventions identified in the International Labour Organisation’s Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and the Human Rights Charter.
This alignment is verified and monitored at the level of the investable universe. A company found to be in violation of these Principles is excluded from the investable universe.
Environmental and social characteristics
The criteria for ESG analysis are selected from a number of categories grouped into four main themes: environmental responsibility, social responsibility, societal responsibility and corporate governance. The four themes correspond to four pillars: environmental, social, societal and governance.
Environment pillar
- General environmental policy
- Emissions footprint
- Energy consumption and mix
- Pollution control and waste management
- Water management and sustainable consumption
- Climate risks
- Biodiversity
Social pillar
Societal pillar
- Anti-corruption policy
- Tax compliance and business ethics
- ESG risks in the supply chain
- Raw materials management
- Consideration of consumer interests
- Charitable engagement and sponsorship
Governance pillar
- ESG approach and transparency
- Certification and labels
- Internal ESG/CSR governance
- Composition of executive bodies
- Remuneration Committee
- Audit Committee
- Profit redistribution
Our ESG analysis takes into account more than 130 ESG criteria on the basis of double materiality analysis. The approach takes into account criteria reflecting sustainability risks to value and risks of negative impacts of companies on sustainability factors.
Our ESG analysis model includes an analysis focused on criteria reflecting the impact of ESG and climate change risks on companies. The ESG analysis captures the exposure of assets to risks arising from the physical and transitional impacts of climate hazards:
- Physical risks caused by weather and climate events which include heat waves, extreme precipitation, sea level rise, etc.
- Transitional risks resulting from the effects of the implementation of a low-carbon economic model, including political, technological, market and reputational risks related to the transition to a low-carbon economy etc.
Thus, the analysis looks at the possible negative impacts of companies’ activities on ESG factors. Investment decisions can impact sustainability factors whether the impact is positive or negative. They can be linked, directly or indirectly, to sustainability factors. The main negative sustainability impacts are defined as the impacts of decisions leading to negative effects on sustainability factors. These impacts arise from the activity and behaviour of the company, but also from the investors, their selection or their management and engagement approach. Environmental, social and societal factors can be affected, covering issues such as respect for human rights, pollution, corruption and others.
We have selected indicators of negative impact based on their significance, availability, likelihood of occurrence and the potentially serious or irreversible nature of their consequences.
Investment strategy
1 – OUR PHILOSOPHY
Our socially responsible and sustainability-conscious convictions drive our extra-financial strategy and investment guidelines.
2 – RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS
We perform our due diligence and ESG analysis on each company.
We conduct an in-depth analysis of the company’s activities, responsible approach and corporate culture.
Our analysis is done in-house using a proprietary tool.
With raw data, collected directly from the company, its reports and publications.
Our analysis is based on quantitative data, supplemented and contextualised by qualitative data.
3 – COMMITMENT AND STEWARDSHIP
We actively engage the company in order to collect data from the management and to discuss possible ways of improvement.
4 – KPI AND TRANSPARENCY
In order to ensure a minimum ESG threshold, for each fund a specific approach is assigned.
In addition, we strive to achieve an ESG performance of the portfolio above that of its benchmark.
We analyse and monitor around 130 KPIs including footprint and emissions intensity for all portfolios. We consider scopes 1, 2 and 3.
The ESG performance of our funds is subject to regular monthly and annual reporting.
The 5 postulates of our extra-financial strategy
REDUCE THE RISKS
Preventing negative impact on value and the environment
Normative and sectoral exclusions
ESG analysis based on double materiality
Pragmatic and objective management of controversies
SEIZE THE OPPORTUNITIES
Focusing on and encouraging positive impact
Positive impact measurement
Constructive and proactive dialogue
Objectives of the fund
Minimum investability threshold
The entire universe is rated and 20% of worst rated companies are excluded
ESG analysis coverage rate
More than 90% by weighting
ESG rating
Higher than benchmark
Exposures
Exposure to sustainable development
The sustainable investment rate is calculated internally by taking into account three criteria: substantial contribution to one or more of the SDGs, absence of significant harm and good governance.
The sustainability calculation distinguishes between environmental goals related to clean water (MDG 6), clean energy (MDG 7), sustainable consumption (MDG 12), combating climate change (MDG 13) and biodiversity (MDG 15), and social goals related to human health (MDG 3), quality education and training (MDG 4), gender equality (MDG 5), decent work (MDG 8), and reducing inequality (MDG 10).
Monitoring environmental and social characteristics
Environment | ||
Unit | Abacus Tech For Good | |
Scope 1+2 emissions | Ton CO2e | 89.2 |
Total energy consumed | GWh | 0.2 |
Ratio of renewable energy in the energy mix | % | 0.42 |
Total amount of waste | K Ton | 0.0047 |
Percentage of waste recycled | % | 0.21 |
Quantity of water consumed | K m3 | 0.45 |
Social | ||
Unit | Abacus Tech For Good | |
Percentage of issuers with a Human Rights Policy | % | 0.76 |
Number of accidents at work | Number | 36.86 |
Number of training hours per employee | nH/nEmployees | 31.15 |
Total percentage of women in the company | % | 0.3 |
Percentage of women in management | % | 0.25 |
Societal | ||
Unit | Abacus Tech For Good | |
Percentage of issuers with an anti-corruption policy | % | 0.93 |
Percentage of issuers taking ESG risks into account in the supply chain | % | 0.7 |
Percentage of issuers with a consumer protection scheme in place | % | 0.85 |
Percentage of certified raw materials | % | 0.24 |
Governance | ||
Unit | Abacus Tech For Good | |
Percentage of issuers with one or more CSR labels | % | 0.7 |
Percentage of issuers with a designated CSR role | % | 0.55 |
Percentage of women on the board of directors | % | 0.35 |
Percentage of women in management bodies | % | 0.25 |
Control during the life of the asset
1 – Monitoring the universe
Initial analysis
2 – Portfolio monitoring
In-depth analysis
3 – Pre-trade control
4 – Post-trade control
5 – Commitment
Methodology
Normative and sectoral exclusions
Best in universe
ESG analysis based on dual materiality
Positive impact measurement
Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions
Promoting E and S characteristics
The fund aims to promote best practice at the level of the financial product and the investee company.
Our mission, as asset managers, is to invest responsibly in order to create sustainable value for all stakeholders. Our objective is twofold:
- On the one hand, we aim to reduce and prevent the negative effects of our investment decisions on the environment and society as a whole.
- On the other hand, we prioritise the measurable, intentional and progressive positive impact of our assets.
All our funds, including Abacus Tech for Good, follow this objective.
To this end, the fund promotes environmental and social attributes through the thorough integration of ESG, climate and SDG factors into its investment and asset management processes. These factors are taken into account at the level of the investment universe, as well as at the level of portfolio creation and management.
Examples of features promoted in the investment universe
Fuel exclusions
Exclusion of controversial behaviour
Examples of features promoted at the portfolio creation stage
Reducing the negative impact of GHG emissions on the environment
Good working conditions
The quest for positive impact
Direct contribution
of companies by sector and type of activity
Sustainable forest management company
Waste management and treatment company
Indirect contribution
of companies by performance
Any company that has implemented energy efficiency measures
Any company that has set up an employee training programme
The Fund uses a specific internal tool to assess the positive impact and sustainability of companies. Our specific impact analysis tool calculates each company’s direct or indirect contribution to one or more Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). As part of the process of building an investment case, we look at companies whose activities intentionally and measurably generate positive environmental and social impacts. This analysis of the positive impact of issuers does not restrict the investment universe.
The impact analysis contains two components for measuring the positive impact of companies:
- Calculation of the direct contribution, looking for the direct or fundamental correlation between the activity of the company invested in and the objectives of sustainable development,
- The calculation of the indirect contribution, due to the company’s approach, behaviour and corporate culture, independently of its activity.
Sustainable investment
The fund calculates the sustainable investment rate for issuers. This calculation is carried out in-house using a proprietary tool that takes three criteria into account: substantial contribution to one or more sustainable development goals (SDGs), absence of significant harm and good governance.
For more information:
Sources and data
External data - internal tools and analysis
We attach great importance to the development of proprietary models built on our expertise to provide tangible added value in the application of our non-financial strategy. Our analysis and monitoring tools respect this principle and aim to offer results that we control as a whole.
Our proprietary tools developed on the basis of international standards
The management team is responsible for scientific, technical and regulatory monitoring in terms of tool development and extra-financial management. It relies on international standards:
- The UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for their granularity and in-depth, global approach.
- The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), for their relevant publications and their work on improving transparency in the extra-financial field;
- Documentary sources published by European Union bodies such as the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and the European Environment Agency (EEA).
- Publications from national public authorities such as, for France, the French Environment and Energy Management Agency (ADEME) and the French Financial Management Agency (AFG);
Methodological limitations
The ESG analysis adopted is based mainly on qualitative and quantitative data provided by the companies themselves. It therefore depends on the heterogeneity of the quality of this information and the quantity of data available. To fill any gaps, the fund contacts companies to obtain the necessary information through ESG questionnaires.
ESG data received from third parties may be incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable from time to time. There may also be a size bias, as large caps have more budget allocated to their responsible and CSR approach.
Carbon analysis is limited by the lack of a clearly defined reporting framework. The methods used by companies to calculate their CO2 emissions may vary in quality as well as in quantity. Thus, the data published by companies may be based on different perimeters of induced emissions (Scope 1, 2, 3). In particular, Scope 3 emissions are often unavailable. All of this can affect the calculation of the portfolio’s overall footprint.
Duty of care
Monitoring of the investable universe :
- Exclusions according to our Exclusion Policy
- Analysis of controversies and risks
- Entitled ESG analysis, with the exclusion of 20% of the worst rated companies (Best in Universe)
Daily monitoring and updating
Portfolio monitoring :
- In-depth ESG analysis
- Impact and sustainability analysis
- Controversy monitoring
Daily monitoring, data update at least annually, ad hoc in case of controversies
Spot check of investability and ESG risk before an order is filled
Updating and monitoring daily ESG ratios.
Daily monitoring of the achievement of ESG objectives within the portfolio:
- Rating above the benchmark
- ESG analysis coverage rate >90%.
- Investability rate >90%.
We communicate with companies on the subject of their responsible approach.
We make contact on several occasions:
- Occasionally, in order to deepen our analysis
- Regularly at ESG forums
- At the request of the company
The management team is also responsible for the identification, measurement and control, at the first level, of the risks related to the implementation of the extra-financial approach within the managed portfolios. These risks are controlled at the second level by the management company’s Middle Office Risk, with the support of the permanent control delegate.
Commitment
Philippe Hottinguer Gestion wishes to promote the consideration of the extra-financial sphere among its clients and investors. The company encourages the integration of ESG factors into the decision-making processes and activities of the companies in which it invests.
The company is committed to the UN Principles for Responsible Investment, to the 6 Principles for Responsible Investment, including those relating to shareholder engagement. We are committed to
- Being active shareholders, integrating ESG issues into our shareholding policies and procedures.
- Encourage the companies in which we invest to publish information about their ESG practices.
- Promote the adoption and implementation of the Principles in the investment industry.
- Cooperate to improve the effectiveness of our implementation of the Principles.
To this end, we have planned several engagement approaches.
Collaborative commitment
Promoting and sharing knowledge on sustainable finance issues
Forums, conferences…
Collaborative platforms
Individual commitment
Protecting and improving the investment process, monitoring ESG performance and encouraging the positive impact of assets
ESG Questionnaire
Constructive and proactive dialogue
Votes at meetings
Aligned with the company’s investment objectives and principles
Votes at meetings
Designated benchmark index
Benchmark index: Eurostoxx
The benchmark follows the same ESG rating strategy with the same KPIs, calculation methods and is rated using the same variable materiality as the portfolio. Compliance with the portfolio’s sustainability objectives is measured daily. This is done in part by using the ESG rating of the benchmark. Other KPIs, such as carbon intensity or footprint, are monitored regularly and reported on a monthly basis. In this sense, the benchmark is continuously monitored and ensured to be aligned with the environmental and social characteristics promoted by the financial product.
The respective ESG scores of the investable universe and the benchmark are weighted by their capitalisation and updated daily to ensure continuous alignment with each ESG objective of the portfolio.
We use the same methodology for calculating the ESG factors of the index and the portfolio. Our responsible investment policy details the methodology applied.
Environment | ||
Unit | Eurostoxx | |
Scope 1+2 emissions | Ton CO2e | 4744543.8 |
Total energy consumed | GWh | 15004.5 |
Ratio of renewable energy in the energy mix | % | 0.28 |
Total amount of waste | K Ton | 891.99 |
Percentage of waste recycled | % | 0.6 |
Quantity of water consumed | K m3 | 103933.64 |
Social | ||
Unit | Eurostoxx | |
Percentage of issuers with a Human Rights Policy | % | 0.96 |
Number of accidents at work | Number | 436.73 |
Number of training hours per employee | nH/nEmployees | 26.22 |
Total percentage of women in the company | % | 0.4 |
Percentage of women in management | % | 0.33 |
Societal | ||
Unit | Eurostoxx | |
Percentage of issuers with an anti-corruption policy | % | 0.97 |
Percentage of issuers taking ESG risks into account in the supply chain | % | 0.93 |
Percentage of issuers with a consumer protection scheme in place | % | 0.92 |
Percentage of certified raw materials | % | 0.46 |
Governance | ||
Unit | Eurostoxx | |
Percentage of issuers with one or more CSR labels | % | 0.51 |
Percentage of issuers with a designated CSR role | % | 0.68 |
Percentage of women on the board of directors | % | 0.39 |
Percentage of women in management bodies | % | 0.24 |